Savita Vs the State of Bharat

I could have made it a case against "The state of india" but keeping with the tradition set by Voice of India/Bharat, "Times of India", I had to name it state of Bharat. According to TOI, somehow, all the things that are progressive and worthy of emulation on the merit of modernity are quintessentially Indian, and all the things that lag behind (on account of being obsolete,on account of being a necessary evil aka tradition or on account of being simply poor) are bharat. That's why we had a poor girl from some town in rural Bharat crying, and her tears being wiped by a hand-ker-chief from the industrial India on the Budget edition. It seems for TOI a new synonym for underprivileged is Bharat. Never fancy a "Times of Bharat".....

Inspite of being an active member of the net community and regularly looking for spicy material to liven my otherwise boring daily routine, I could not get to know of "Savita Bhabhi" until recently, when to many's horror, Savita Bhabhi was banned from Indian Cyber Space. Too late for me to sex it up a little through cartoon porn, no no, Indian cartoon porn. I could get hold of a couple of articles on the net which ridiculed the government for banning the "Bhabhi" for a plethora of reasons. I agree with some, not so much with the others. One article justly says that the government has no right to play the "Net Nanny", and its upto the parents to take care of what their children with impressionable minds watch on the net. Adding to that the article also said that there was infinite amount of porn available anyway on the internet hosted on servers outside the purview of the indian rule.

What amused me to the core was this article from the TOI (anybody's guess)

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS-Sunday-TOI-View-From-Venus-Savita-Bhabhi-is-dead-Long-live-Indian-hypocrisy/articleshow/4794372.cms

The article laments the hypocrisy so intertwined in the Indian bureaucracy that they cannot break free from it even if they so willed. All till here is fine. The fun part starts when the article quotes some sociologist from Delhi which I shall quote here verbatim

“To me, Savita Bhabhi was as if India, in spite of its coyness, had come of age" (Yawn-1)

And I thought women like Kiran Mazumdar Shaw, Aishwariya Rai and of course Mayawati would represent the Indian women if at any point in time India did in fact come of age. It seems that the country could have come of age a lot sooner if the creator of Savita Bhabhi, a certain someone, would have realized his tryst with destiny sooner. Alas !, the hero of our society and the channel to do so could'nt wake up earlier. The article also goes ahead and epitomizes the hypocricy in indian society by saying that we have khajoraho (Yawn-2) and thats why we should allow whatever we should allow. Thank God or the sculptors of Khajuraho, elsewise what examples would these socialites, I am sorry, sociologists and progressives cite.

Everybody needs to prove their point by some mean or the other. The ones taking the decisions got to indulge yet again in their self-righteousness by banning the loving (literally) bhabhi and the sociologists gotta prove theirs through remarks and examples as stark as the

sexcapades of the Bhabhi herself. No one seems to notice that not every band is floyd and not every woman living the ravenous, hypothetical, kick-those-MCPs-in-the-balls life is gonna emancipate the society in general and women in particular. Lets let the Bhabhi live for all the people who draw inspiration, gratification or whatever they want, and if she can not let her die.

Lets not make a martyr.